Education Secretary Betsy DeVos offered a positively Orwellian
explanation Monday of
why historically black colleges and universities were created in the United
States. Incredibly, she suggested that
they were “real pioneers” in the school-choice movement and “started from the
fact that there were too many students in America who did not have equal access
to education.”
The Education Department’s
own website —
on a page titled “Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Higher
Education Desegregation” — offers a more accurate history. These colleges, it
shows, were created, beginning in the 19th century, as a direct response to
rigid racial segregation when the doors of white colleges were typically closed
to African-Americans.
Rather than integrate
colleges, the Southern and border states established parallel, Jim Crow systems
in which black college students were typically confined to segregated campuses
handicapped by meager budgets and inferior libraries and facilities. Litigation
over the funding equity issue continues to this day.
Ms. DeVos’s insulting
distortion of history, which she tried to pull back after furious criticism,
grows out of her obsession with market-driven school policies, including the
idea of a publicly funded voucher program that public school students could use
to pay for private education.
But as Kevin Carey reported in The Times just last week, new
research shows that voucher programs may actually harm many students by
shunting them into low-quality private schools. Taken together, three of the
largest voucher programs in the country, enrolling nearly 180,000 children
nationwide, showed negative results.
A 2015 study of an Indiana
program that served tens of thousands of students found that voucher students
who transferred to private schools did significantly worse in mathematics — and
showed no improvement in reading.
A study of
a Louisiana voucher program last year serving predominantly black and
low-income families found reading and math scores went down when children
transferred to private schools. The performance decline was significant: Public
elementary school children who started at the 50th percentile in math dropped
to the 26th percentile within a year of transferring to a private school.
And a study of
a large program in Ohio — conducted by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute — found
that students who used vouchers to attend private schools fared worse
academically compared with their peers attending public school.
At the very least, these
studies show that the private schools cannot be presumed superior to public
schools. These dismal results also make clear that free-market mechanisms that
work well in business can be damaging when applied to the lives of
schoolchildren.
Ms. DeVos’s strange interpretation of this country’s racist
history was probably meant to pave the way for market-driven education
policies. Ignorant statements notwithstanding, those policies have proved to be
failures.
No comments:
Post a Comment